(no subject)
May. 26th, 2006 10:57 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
bafleyanneA poll, by a member of the LJ Abuse team, asking whether breastfeeding icons should be exempt from the nudity rule for default icons.
http://erin.livejournal.com/489550.html
Go vote, either way you feel. :)
http://erin.livejournal.com/489550.html
Go vote, either way you feel. :)
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2006-05-26 05:13 pm (UTC)My comment was this:
"I voted "yes" because the icons don't bother me, but I wanted to comment and say that I think the "no nipple in the default icon" rule is a perfectly reasonable one, and I can't really think of the last time I saw a genuine breastfeeding picture that had the nipple showing (the eating baby obscures the nipple, which is the entire point in the first place), so despite my general pro-breastfeedingness, I don't have any problem with the policy as it currently stands.
But it wouldn't bother me if my children saw a breast on LiveJournal in a non-sexualized context like breastfeeding or a non-sexual artwork, either."
(no subject)
From: